The Giant Anteater in the Room: Brazil's Neglected Tropical Diseases Problem

The phrase ‘‘the 800-pound gorilla in the room’’ refers to an obvious problem that everyone knows exists but pretends or chooses to ignore. In my December 2007 PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases editorial I wrote about an unseemly underbelly of poverty that exists in my country, the United States of America, and the unacceptable disease burden among our poor that results from such neglected diseases as toxocariasis, cysticercosis, and toxoplasmosis [1]. According to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) (the regional office of the World Health Organization in the Americas) the Latin American and Caribbean region suffers from much larger pockets of poverty, and with it endemic neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) [2]. While researching a review of the NTDs in Latin America, I was particularly struck by the disproportionate concentration of these conditions among the poor living in Brazil. Although there are no gorillas in the rooms of Brazil I have concluded that the NTDs represent an ominous giant anteater (Myrmecophaga tridactyla, the largest species of anteater found in Brazil and elsewhere in the American tropics) that requires notice, attention, and urgent action. According to the World Bank, 22% of the population of Latin America and the Caribbean lives on less than US$2 per day [3]. An identical percentage of Brazil’s population is also impoverished [4]. However, based on the Gini coefficient index, a metric that measures inequality of income or wealth distribution, Brazil at 0.59 has one of the greatest disparities between wealthy and poor people anywhere in the world [5]. One of the ways that this inequality manifests is in a shockingly high burden of NTDs. The roughly 40 million Brasileiros who live on less than US$2 per day [4] account for one-third of all of the poor people living in the Latin American and Caribbean region [3], but they suffer disproportionately from NTDs. Shown in Table 1 is a summary of Brazil’s NTD burden. Based on information available from published peer-reviewed papers in the biomedical literature, as well as publicly available Web sites from PAHO and WHO [6–13], most of the NTD disease burden in Latin America and the Caribbean now occurs in Brazil, including virtually all of the cases of blinding trachoma and leprosy, and the majority of ascariasis, dengue, hookworm infection, schistosomiasis, and visceral leishmaniasis. Practically speaking these data mean that most of Brazil’s poorest 40 million people are infected with one or more NTD, especially either hookworms (Necator americanus) or roundworms (Ascaris lumbricoides) or both. For instance, in collaboration with the Centro des Pesquisas Rene Rachou of FIOCRUZ (Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz) we recently showed that 68% of some rural communities in Minas Gerais State are infected with hookworms [14], which cause anemia and malnutrition [15]. In these same poor people the presence of hookworms in their intestines promotes susceptibility to coinfections with other worms, especially Ascaris roundworms and schistosomes (14). Throughout Minas Gerais and neighboring Bahia states, hookworm is known as amarelao, referring to the yellow–sallow complexion that results from chronic infection. Hookworm and other important NTDs are also major public health problems among Brazil’s indigenous people [16–19] and citizens of African descent [20]. Recently, an economist at the University of Chicago found that chronic hookworm infection during childhood reduces future wage-earning by 43% [21] meaning that hookworm represents an important reason why poor people become trapped in poverty. This is the very same hookworm that sapped the energy from Jeca Tatu, the laborer popularized by the Brazilian writer Monteiro Lobato in the early twentieth century. An important feature of almost all of the NTDs is that they not only occur in the poverty setting but also promote poverty [22]. In 2003, President Luiz Inacio Lula a Silva launched Zero Hunger, an ambitious $500 million antipoverty drive focused on malnutrition [23]. However, as the World Food Programme has already discovered [24], in the absence of concurrent NTD control, measures that feed the children often simply result in feeding the worms first. Concurrent NTD control would make great sense, as it is now ranked among the most cost-effective health measures [22], and at a 15%–30% rate of return, a highly cost-effective antipoverty measure as well [25,26]. NTD control would represent one of the most efficient and effective mechanisms for lifting the 40 million most poor Brazilians out of poverty. Everything is in place for Brazil to launch a nationwide effort geared at solving one of its greatest health disparities. The country has a charismatic president who is committed to the poor; it has in FIOCRUZ and other health ministry agencies and its universities some of the best disease control experts anywhere in the world (many of whom serve on the Editorial Board of PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases); and, through these same organizations and a sophisticated biotech-